Johan Santana got traded yesterday. It was made official today. I don't know if we got a handful of magic beans...or a hill of beans. Four prospects. No major-league-ready pitcher. No major-league-ready center-fielder. I don't think much of anything would have made me happy to lose El Presidente, Mr. Cy, the best player in baseball. So I don't know if I'm just grousing or if I'm genuinely upset that we didn't get enough.
Some folks I know started talking about this deal, and discussing how player loyalty has fallen by the wayside. Someone started talking about fan loyalty...do we even deserve Johan's love?
"We sometimes talk about how players should have loyalty to the team but we don't seem to have problems saying things like, "the Twins need an upgrade at this position," or to use an example we all remember, "When are the Twins going to just dump Ponson's sorry ass?" We all invest something looking for something in return."
I read this as saying that we, as fans, demand loyalty, but somehow aren't loyal in return. That wanting "something in return" (for our team to try to be the best it can be) is somehow different than, and less than, loyalty. In return, I want my team to try to do their best. I want the front office to recognize genuine weaknesses and try to remedy them. I want the coaching staff to realize that some things aren't working and try to change them. I want to be able to get excited about successes, and to be able to worry about difficulties and mourn failures. It's easy to be "loyal" to a team that wins every year and has a damn good shot at the playoffs. But what happens if they have a bad year? Real loyalty is still loving a team that isn't perfect, and knowing they aren't perfect, being utterly clear-headed about their weaknesses, but loving them anyway. I love the Twins, but I know they have weaknesses. I admire Kansas City fans, but if they don't sit around every offseason saying, "I have hope that this massive change will happen, and it will fix what we all know is seriously wrong with this team," then it's not loyalty, it's blind belief in the impossible.
In exchange, even when the Twins have a losing year, or a losing decade (okay, almost decade, between 1991 and 2001), I will find every upside and every bright side. I won't pretend I have no idea something's wrong. But I'll find those young Toriis and Jacques and get excited about their potential. I'll read the box scores, listen to the games on the radio, listen online, watch online...wherever technology takes me, I'll be there, cheering. When I sit down at a coffee shop in small-town virginia (sure, it won't likely happen again, but I don't know where I'll be next time the Twins are starting from the very bottom) and someone tries to take my sports section away and I tell him, "hey, I'm reading that!" and he quizzes me...'where's Cuddyer from?' 'Virginia.' 'Where's Hunter from?' 'Pine Bluff, Arkansas.' I'll know the answers. I'll be at that debut game where Torii hit the wall in center field, fell down, got up, threw to home, and got the guy out (I'm pretty sure that was opening day in 1997, at least I have the baseball from that game, and I remember the play, and I put the two together), and I'll be overjoyed, but it won't stop me from saying that the team has no pitching. (ETA: A little research suggests to me that the game I'm thinking of was opening day of 1999, as Torii only played seven games before that, none of them on opening day.) I'll be there, every step of the way, up and down, and I won't pretend it's all up. To me, that's loyalty. Not to pretend the team has no weaknesses, but to know the weaknesses, recognize them, point them out, but to still be there every day anyway. Fan loyalty isn't to pretend Ponson's a hero, but to say, "Dump Ponson. He sucks. But I love the team every day anyway. I'll be a fan every day Ponson's on the team, but please dump him because he will never be any good for the team I love."
Goodbye, Johan. I want to wish you all the best, but it's hard, when I also want baseball to right itself, and come back down to earth. You're amazing, and one of the best things to happen to baseball this decade. But your contract with the Mets may be one of the worst things to happen to baseball. I wish you loved us enough to stay for four years, $21 million a year. I wish Pohlad had offered you close to what you're worth. But I'll still love my team, knowing all the while they'd be better with you on it.
1 comment:
That does suck that you lose a player of such high caliber. I think I felt the same way when we didn't renew Pedro Martinez's contract in 2004 ( yep, die-hard sox). Montreal probably felt bad for us taking him ( especially since all we dealt was an injury-prone Tony Armas jr.)
You are absolutely right about loyalty. There are a lot of players I have clung on to even though they left, a lot of decisions I have defended of players, GMs, & managers ( full respect for the Grady Little/Pedro decision in 2003 ALCS), a lot of gasps I have created hearing nonsense radio talk show hosts bash my team, and through it all, there's nothing that makes me more happy than knowing my team and the next game they are going to play.
You place that you had losing years from 1991-2001, but in the late 90's you had very good players. I remember you had the Brad Radke, Rich Robertson, Mientkewicz, Ortiz and Pierzinski. I remember that at one point I think it was like 50% of all polish players playing baseball were on the Twins.
I always remember every series at least two balls the outfielders would lose in the dome. I always cursed that they should put some red streaks on the ceiling or something; I think that was my only qualm with your team. Oh yea, Lew Ford use to kill the Sox a lil while back.
In a way, it is crazy that were going to dissolve your team a few years back. The fact you were able to put up with those years I give you a lot of props. There are way too many fair-weather fans around, especially when the Pats and Sox hype came around.
Wish you the best for your season.
Post a Comment